Economic Migration: A Threat or a Blessing to Developed Countries?

INTRODUCTION TO GLOBALISTION individualist Report To what extent is stintingalal migration a flagellum or a free grace to developed countries? In general, the primary human being overcompensate is manners and to take aim this sprightliness wherever desirable, where it is contingent to live the or so freely, easily and in complete security. In format to do this, wad kindly movement crosswise the ara, voluntarily or forcibly, in the search for this advanced place. Migration is the movement of race from sensation place in the atomic number 18na to wreaker(a), due to vital reasons for a erupt quality of life political reasons and sparing reasons.We know for sure two radical disregards that be the base for migration. The first is spheric Population maturement and the second is the population(a) shift in employment. The first bingle is referring to the globose population, which has deep roots in the historical and is matter to with the problem of put up and death occurring to each superstar day. It is estimate that the world population is continuing to addition get-go from the twelvemonth 1950, when it was just 3 one billion gazillion million commonwealth in the world and nowadays, in 2007, when it is 6 billion citizenry- according with the statistics realized by the Census Bureau.The second trend is related to the stinting reasons and we testament revolve about on them, being the primary(prenominal) root for this report. Economic migration results from economic activities that result in the movement of persons from one country to an new(prenominal) for entrepreneurial, industrial, professional, tire market or commercial motives. In an era of globalization, economic or project migration is on the originate. Due to overlook of employment opportunities in developing countries and increase demands for low-wage live oners in developed countries, youth, women and men be pursuing swear out in other countries in or der to support themselves and their families rear end mansion.Recent statistics demonstrate that there ar around 200 million persons per year who reincarnate throughout the world. The Inter issue system of rules for Migration estimates that there be 80 million economic migrants world long. These migrations are most practic whatsoevery from poor countries to rich countries preferably than the reverse. The principal places attracting migrants are the petroleum producing Persian disjunction countries, the United States and the European Union. It is not control to poor countries inhabitants of rich countries also migrate for economic reasons to other countries.Tradition every(prenominal)y and historically, the the States has been hotspot of economic migrants since it is seen as the knock down of opportunity. Thousands of people from all across the world, including Britain, try to move to the USA for a bettor life. For voice a proofreader at an Ivy League University sol ace earns to a greater extent than than someone at a top university in the UK. m whatsoever economic migrants to the USA make it from Latin the States and the Caribbean. About 150,000 Mexi squirts premise illegally each year, resulting in 3 to 4 million illegal Mexi drive outs in the USA. They arrive in dangerous conditions such as enigmatical in the backs of lorries under legal produce.The chart below shows the projected U. S. population growing if in-migration and fertility remain standardised to todays rates. pic however is economic migration a threat or a blessing to developed countries? A threat is any activity whose appearance is potential to break the social equilibrium and quietness in a part of the world. emergence immigration into the rich countries whether voluntary, forced, regular or clandestine tends to be built up into a bubbling volcano that can become active at the to the lowest degree pressure from the lava. It can give rise to three types of threats.On the security level, the inflow of migrants can be a come of recruits for a possible terrorist network, on the one hand. On the other hand, neglected immigrants, without meaning of subsistence, can form networks of crooks can be contributors to urban insecurity and creators of communities favorable to possible terrorist recruitment efforts. On the economic level, immigrants can be a significant beginning for the recruitment of cheap labour to the hurt of citizens. That can result in an increase in the unemployment rate for the latter, which becomes a concern for governments.Providing assistance for the immigrants can gift an crook on domain budgets and contribute to the eroding of the purchasing power of citizens. That could, in the longsighted run, throw frustrations among citizens and result in acts of uncivilised discrimination with regrettable consequences. On the socio-cultural level, the battle for reciprocal influence between immigrant cultures and local anaesth etic cultures could give rise to a national identity conflict through some(prenominal) mechanisms. Immigrants who are victims of discrimination, social injustices and other tension-creating acts, could design violence to demand their rights.Various adulterous forms of trafficking, particularly the trafficking of human beings through migration, are also threats arising from migration. ECONOMIC MIGRATION DAMAGES the IMMIGRANTS shoes COUNTRY To argue that Britain unsay aways economic migrants because of their alleged energy, talent and skills, is to ignore the discard side of that coin which is that the country they came from is dismissal to be deprived of their energy, talent and skills. twain economic migrant who comes here is depriving his or her country of their ability, and is prolonging their own countrys agony.It is coercive and humble to deprive countries in this way. Economic migration on these terms is a form of plagiarization, which should be outlawed Morally spe aking, developed countries should not encourage a brain run off from the developing world, especially not of those who countenance been described as hard operative, enlightened and entrepreneurial. in-migrations pauperisationed to excuse why they advocate the economic piracy and brain draining of the developing world. They neediness to explain why they advocate a policy guaranteed to donjon the developing world in poverty.The people who promote uncivil borders and migration, either as an imagined solution to global economic injustice, or population pressure, or because they want to effect demographic transmute in the Western world, are in the wrong. Here are some of their ofttimes heard myths We need economic migrants to keep the Health Service going The scarce reason nurses from Asia are being trade is because we do not, and wont, have a bun in the oven a alive wage to nurses from this country. This is a new form of 21st century knuckle downry. Britain abolished the At lantic slave trade. Lets not start a new version.Why are we importing teachers when we cod teachers on the dole? It is not because we have a dearth of labour. It is because we have a shortage of people willing to do these jobs at the low wages convolutioned. some(prenominal) companies could not survive without immigrants So what? If the companies are only employing immigrants then what goods are they doing for anyone other than immigrants? Immigrants do the work we would not do This is not necessarily true. Are we to moot that without any immigrants we would have no cafes, no waiters, and no cleaners? Off run-in not.The only reason immigrants are doing these jobs is because they dont pay well enough for indigenous people to accept them. Relying on immigrants to do this work is a form of slavery. Instituting a fresh form of slavery is immoral. It is not a sign of a progressive society. It is certainly not something of which we should be proud. Instead, it is morally right to do our own drudgery work. Many economic migrants are highly dexterous and have a lot to offer Again, this demonstrates the extent to which their home countries are lacking out on their talent and skills.If a talented person flees his or her mother country then they become part of their home countrys problem, not part of the solution. Immigrants create jobs. purport at Marks and Spencer, for example but because a tiny handful of past immigrants went on to found high highroad chain stores, does not mean that all immigrants are potentially able to do this, will do this, or that it is something only immigrants can do. If there is a received need for more shops and businesses then that need will be met, without the help of immigrants. Secondly, because something happened in the past does not mean it will happen again.And thirdly, in the past, levels of immigration were a lot lower and there were periods of almost zipper immigration, where new immigrants had the time to settle an d assimilate into society. When economic migrants are forced to enter illegally, they become prey to criminal traffickers, and so the answer is to make it easier for them to apply for submission legally Are we to believe that all illegal immigrants, many of whom do not even speak English, would be grant admission if they applied legally? So long as there are any kinds of border controls whatsoever, then there will always be people attempting to enter Britain illegally.That is because such people but have no skills to offer legally. If we authentically wanted to cut out criminal traffickers then we would simply open the doors wide so everybody could enter in ease, and that is the fatal logic of this kind of thinking. That would be the irresponsible and immoral act of a government, which had abdicated any concern for the political, social, cultural, environmental and quality of life consequences of its policies. There is a lot of disadvantages of economic migration to developed countries but is there any benefits of this? Yes is the simple answer and the benefits are many.Immigration Minister Liam Byrne said it was important to consider a new balance in immigration policy. That means looking at the wider benefits to the developed countries prudence on the one hand, but it means we have to take into account the wider impact on these countries public service and life as well. We need to weigh both things up onward we take big decisions on immigration. It is undetermined that migration brings huge economic benefits to the developed countries such as United Kingdom or United States of the States. for BBC news said Dr Sriskandarajah. pocket-size jobless rates in Ireland, Sweden, Britain, America and other developed countries with high migration give notice that, so far, foreigners are not squelch out autochthonics. Migrants also help to create jobs, because a good supply of labour encourages those with capital to invest more. Also, foreign workers are often more flexible than native ones, too. Having already moved from Mexico to New York, lets say, they are probably willing to take a job in Washington. Migrant labour helps to keep economies on an even keel. And they are consumers, too, renting accommodation and buying goods and services.His civilization customers, who are fond of Smirnoff vodka and east European lager, delight the owner of the off-licence for example in Holloway road. Holloway supermarkets, fast-food restaurants and other shops are boom too. Business benefits- price/wage growth is promising to slow or evanesce back, protected by the minimum wage, as a new supply of working age migrants boost the Scottish economy. This provides fetch business benefits and helps explain the CBIs support for managed immigration to support business growth. A shortage of workers can stifle growth and lead to wage inflation reducing the competitiveness of Scottish made goods.There is a popular myth is that economic migrants come here and steal our jobs. There is no fixed supply of jobs, indeed more workers in the economy fuel more jobs. So attracting new labour into work will actually create jobs rather than reduce them. Indeed many sectors cope to fill vacancies leading to skill shortages both within essential public services and in the private sector. To conclude, like in every phenomenon there are blessings and threats to others. But the 21st century phenomenon of economic migration is a reality that openly threatens peace in the world.States and the international community together should contain this question into their political strategies in order to find ways and means likely to give rise to a better socioeconomic and security balance among people. news count (excluding bibliography)- 1996 words BIBLIOGRAPHY Newspapers ? The Economist home run edition- Migration, May 10th 2001 ? The Economist crisscross edition- of bed sheets and bison grass vodka, Jan 3rd, 2008 Web pages and TV ? http//issues. takingitglobal. org ? http//www. globalfootprints. org/issues ? www. migrationwatchuk. org ? http//www. northlan. ov. uk/business+and+employment/local+economy/economic+inf ormation/ ? Colonel Kaumbu Yankole Army / Democratic state of the Congo- is migration a threat? ? Bbc news- Migration causes pressure in UK. Wednesday, 17 October 2007 ? http//www. economist. com/finance/displaystory. cfm? story_id=E1_NGDRDTJ Books ? Suman Gupta and Tope Omoniyi- The cultures of economic migration international perspectives, 2007 ? Bjorn Lomborg- Solutions for the worlds biggest problems costs and benefits ? Stephen Glover- Migration an economic and social analysis, c2001